
In "‘An Archival Impulse" (October 110, Fall 2004), Hal Foster proposes an "archival art" (Tacita Dean, Sam Durant, Thomas Hirschhorn are his examples) as a form of post-canon ruin more oppositional than the database, one more "fragmentary...than fungible," too "recalcitrantly material" to be easily picked through. Foster’s contrast between the material conditions of the database and those of the archive can perhaps be set parallel to the conditions of contemporary social networking and those underlying what Bill Readings has called "dissensus," which he describes as a means of "dwelling in the ruins" – that is, of conducting social life and conversation in a post-national, post-cultural situation. Readings’s "dissensus" occurs in a ruins, not a matrix; its conduct follows the logic of opacity and obligation rather than advertisement and availability; and its participants are not subjects or identities but singularities, which are resistant, not available or "fungible," to network transactions, to the market demand of infinite exchangeability. (See Bill Readings, The University in Ruins, Cambridge, and London: Harvard University Press, 1996).

No comments:
Post a Comment